Project AURIONAI Use-Cases Research & Innovation

MMLU-Pro

10-option multiple-choice questions across 14 domains; a harder version of MMLU

knowledge and reasoningcrowded
23scores
23models
0independent
0maintainer-run
23vendor-reported

Definition

Version
not in the notes
Category
knowledge and reasoning
Maintainer
TIGER-Lab (U. Waterloo et al.), Canada
Status
crowded
Home page
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01574

Sources

  1. deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro , Hugging Face huggingface.co https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  2. MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark arxiv.org https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01574
  3. MMLU-Pro Leaderboard & Scores , October 2026 benchlm.ai https://www.benchlm.ai/benchmarks/mmlu-pro

Scores at a Glance

Score in %

Higher is better for this unit.

1Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba (Qwen)
87.8 %
vendor-reported2DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek
87.5 %
vendor-reported3NVIDIANemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA
86.8 %
vendor-reported4Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba (Qwen)
86.2 %
vendor-reported5UpstageSolar Open 2Upstage
86.2 %
vendor-reported6GoogleGemma 4 31BGoogle, Google DeepMind
85.2 %
vendor-reported7LG AI ResearchK-EXAONE 2.0LG AI Research
83.5 %
vendor-reported8Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5-9BAlibaba (Qwen)Not independently verified
82.5 %
vendor-reported9Sarvam AISarvam 105BSarvam AI
81.7 %
vendor-reported10Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5-4BAlibaba (Qwen)Not independently verified
79.1 %
vendor-reported11IBMGranite 4.2 8BIBM
74.04 %
vendor-reported12Microsoft AIPhi-4-mini-instructMicrosoft AI
52.8 %
vendor-reported13AI21 LabsJamba 1.5 MiniAI21 LabsCoT
42.5 %
vendor-reported14CohereCommand R (Mar '24)Cohere, Cohere LabsTIGER-Lab MMLU-Pro as quoted on the model card
37.9 %
vendor-reported
0255075100
Where this comes from
Each bar is one model, with its most independent recorded score. Hatched bars are vendor-reported; the word beside each bar says who ran it. Settings and dates differ between rows; the Scores table below has every result.

Scores

23 of 23 scores shown mmlu-pro-scores.csv
ModelScoreWho ran itSettingView or populationDateSource
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.7 Max89.6 %vendor-reported–rank 1, BenchLM aggregator, top score10 Oct 2026benchlm.ai
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5-397B-A17B87.8 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Pro87.5 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
NVIDIANemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B86.8 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.6-27B86.2 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
UpstageSolar Open 286.2 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
GoogleGemma 4 31B85.2 %vendor-reported––Apr 2026huggingface.co
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus85 %vendor-reportedModel card comparison table; mode not statedDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus model card22 Sep 2025huggingface.co
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Flash84.9 %vendor-reported–MiMo-V2-Flash model card, post-trained model table16 Dec 2025huggingface.co
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V3.184.8 %vendor-reportedThinking mode, EMDeepSeek-V3.1 model card21 Aug 2025huggingface.co
LG AI ResearchK-EXAONE 2.083.5 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
Arcee AITrinity-Large-Thinking83.4 %vendor-reported–Trinity-Large-Thinking model card1 Apr 2026huggingface.co
MeituanLongCat-Flash (LongCat-Flash-Chat)82.68 %vendor-reportedaccLongCat-Flash-Chat model cardSep 2025huggingface.co
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5-9B82.5 %vendor-reportedNot independently verified–Mar 2026rits.shanghai.nyu.edu
LG AI ResearchEXAONE 4.0 (32B)81.8 %vendor-reportedReasoning modeEXAONE 4.0 model cardJul 2025huggingface.co
Sarvam AISarvam 105B81.7 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5-4B79.1 %vendor-reportedNot independently verified–Mar 2026rits.shanghai.nyu.edu
IBMGranite 4.2 8B74.04 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
RekaReka Flash 365 %vendor-reported–Reka Flash 3 announcementMar 2025reka.ai
Microsoft AIPhi-4-mini-instruct52.8 %vendor-reported–––huggingface.co
IBMGranite-4.0-H-Micro43.48 %vendor-reported5-shot, CoTGranite-4.0-H-Micro model card2 Oct 2025huggingface.co
AI21 LabsJamba 1.5 Mini42.5 %vendor-reportedCoT–Aug 2024huggingface.co
CohereCommand R (Mar '24)37.9 %vendor-reportedTIGER-Lab MMLU-Pro as quoted on the model card––huggingface.co
Where this comes from
Scores from different settings, harnesses or dates are not directly comparable; the row says which. Sorted by score, highest first, as a reading aid, not a ranking.

To cite this page: Project AURION, AI Use-Cases Research & Innovation, "MMLU-Pro", https://aurion.semai.id/benchmarks/mmlu-pro/, records of October 2026.