Project AURIONAI Use-Cases Research & Innovation

ProgramBench

Program construction tasks

codingactive
4scores
4models
1independent
0maintainer-run
3vendor-reported

Definition

Version
not in the notes
Category
coding
Maintainer
not in the notes
Status
active
Home page
not in the notes

Sources

  1. Claude Fable 5.1 Benchmarks, Cost and Capabilities | Vals AI vals.ai https://vals.ai/models/anthropic_claude-fable-5-1
  2. huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K3 https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K3
  3. huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code

Scores at a Glance

Score in %

Higher is better for this unit.

0255075100
Where this comes from
Each bar is one model, with its most independent recorded score. Hatched bars are vendor-reported; the word beside each bar says who ran it. Settings and dates differ between rows; the Scores table below has every result.

Scores

4 of 4 scores shown programbench-scores.csv
ModelScoreWho ran itSettingView or populationDateSource
Moonshot AIKimi K377.8 %vendor-reportedKimi Code harness––huggingface.co
Moonshot AIKimi K2.7 Code53.6 %vendor-reportedKimi Code CLI, thinking––huggingface.co
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Flash26 %vendor-reported–MiMo-V2.6 model card comparison table21 Sep 2026huggingface.co
AnthropicClaude Fable 5.17 % ±1.81independentVals.ai, max effort––vals.ai
Where this comes from
Scores from different settings, harnesses or dates are not directly comparable; the row says which. Sorted by score, highest first, as a reading aid, not a ranking.

To cite this page: Project AURION, AI Use-Cases Research & Innovation, "ProgramBench", https://aurion.semai.id/benchmarks/programbench/, records of October 2026.